{"id":114203,"date":"2025-02-13T17:00:55","date_gmt":"2025-02-14T00:00:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/?p=114203"},"modified":"2025-02-13T13:31:18","modified_gmt":"2025-02-13T20:31:18","slug":"envivo-pleno-de-la-scjn-discute-suspensiones-contra-la-reforma-judicial","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/?p=114203","title":{"rendered":"#EnVivo Pleno de la SCJN discute suspensiones contra la reforma judicial"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>El ministro Ortiz Mena present\u00f3 un proyecto que sostiene que las resoluciones del TEPJF no pueden invalidar las suspensiones emitidas por jueces de Distrito.<\/p>\n<p>Este jueves la\u00a0<strong>Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Naci\u00f3n<\/strong>\u00a0(SCJN) inici\u00f3 la\u00a0<strong>discusi\u00f3n<\/strong>\u00a0de un\u00a0<strong>proyecto<\/strong>\u00a0para definir si el Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federaci\u00f3n (<strong>TEPJF<\/strong>) tiene\u00a0<strong>competencia<\/strong>\u00a0para\u00a0<strong>invalidar<\/strong>\u00a0las\u00a0<strong>suspensiones<\/strong>\u00a0concedidas en amparo por jueces federales contra la\u00a0<strong>reforma<\/strong>\u00a0<strong>judicial<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Sesi\u00f3n del Pleno de la #SCJN 13 de febrero de 2025\" width=\"1200\" height=\"675\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/A2meTAHfsrA?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>El\u00a0<strong>ministro Alfredo Guti\u00e9rrez Ortiz Mena<\/strong>\u00a0present\u00f3 un proyecto en el que sostiene que las resoluciones del TEPJF no pueden invalidar las suspensiones de amparo emitidas por los jueces de Distrito.<\/p>\n<p>No obstante, la magistrada presidenta M\u00f3nica Soto afirma que\u00a0<strong>ninguna autoridad puede revocar sentencias<\/strong>\u00a0del Tribunal Electoral porque \u201cson definitivas e inatacables\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Asimismo, solicit\u00f3 a la ministra presidenta Norma Pi\u00f1a y a los ministros Alfredo Guti\u00e9rrez, Javier L\u00e1ynez y Jorge Pardo Rebolledo\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/lopezdoriga.com\/nacional\/tepjf-pide-cuatro-ministros-corte-excusarse-proyecto-elecciones-judiciales\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">excusarse del proyecto<\/a>\u00a0por haberse manifestado p\u00fablicamente contra la reforma judicial.<\/p>\n<p>Con informaci\u00f3n de L\u00f3pez-D\u00f3riga Digital<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El ministro Ortiz Mena present\u00f3 un proyecto que sostiene que las resoluciones del TEPJF no pueden invalidar las suspensiones emitidas por jueces de Distrito. Este jueves la\u00a0Suprema Corte de Justicia de la Naci\u00f3n\u00a0(SCJN) inici\u00f3 la\u00a0discusi\u00f3n\u00a0de un\u00a0proyecto\u00a0para definir si el Tribunal Electoral del Poder Judicial de la Federaci\u00f3n (TEPJF) tiene\u00a0competencia\u00a0para\u00a0invalidar\u00a0las\u00a0suspensiones\u00a0concedidas en amparo por jueces federales contra la\u00a0reforma\u00a0judicial. El\u00a0ministro Alfredo Guti\u00e9rrez Ortiz Mena\u00a0present\u00f3 un proyecto en el que sostiene que las resoluciones del TEPJF no pueden invalidar las suspensiones de amparo emitidas por los jueces de Distrito. No obstante, la magistrada presidenta M\u00f3nica Soto afirma que\u00a0ninguna autoridad puede revocar sentencias\u00a0del Tribunal Electoral [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":114213,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[75,72],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-114203","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-nacional","category-portada","post--single"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/pleno-scjn-suprema-corte.webp","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114203","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=114203"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114203\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":114214,"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/114203\/revisions\/114214"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/114213"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=114203"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=114203"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ovelanalista.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=114203"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}